Global hunger is now affecting around 830 million people across the world, according to the United Nations World Food Program.
The ‘Hunger Hot Spots’ of the world!
- Besides the crisis in Darfur, the food situation in the rest of Sudan has left nearly 7 million people hungry.
- The tsunami-struck Indonesian island of Java is left with 30,000 people homeless affecting more than 100,000 people poor and hungry.
- With the recent volcanic eruption in the Andean region of Ecuador, more than 100,000 people are affected with an estimated 25,000 people left in dire need for food supplies.
- The 2.5 million in Pakistan are left homeless with the 2005 earthquake claiming 73,000 lives are yet to recover completely form poverty and hunger.
- During the last 15 years, drought and the worst locust invasion have left Niger impoverished with exceptionally poor harvests in 2005. Food crisis — combined with record high prices for staple foods — has left millions struggling to feed themselves and their families.
Safety of genetically-modified (GM) foods has always been in question!

- The scientific research on genes from genetically modified (GM) maize that may have been found in native Mexican species in 2001 had sparked intense debate in the UK over the safety of genetically-modified (GM) foods.
- Food containing genetically modified ingredients has been banned in Britain and had to go on sale in the country only after being labeled GM-free in 2001.
- In 2004, a new front has opened up in France in the controversy over genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food with a group of radical rural campaigners emerging surprisingly to claim in favour of open- field experiments.
- Industry groups and environmental organizations have created pressure on biotech companies heavily for moving away from producing medicinal proteins through the genetic engineering of staple food plants.
Here is perhaps a better solution!
– ‘Genetically modified cotton seeds — its edible!
The seeds of cotton plant are naturally toxic. But, scientists have genetically modified these toxic seeds to be a potential food source for millions of people starving across the world!
The researchers have developed a method of reducing gossypol - the seeds’ powerful toxin — to a negligible level. It is reduced to an extent that the ‘throw-away’ is made suitable to be consumed by humans.
And to add to this development, enough cotton has already been planted worldwide capable of supplying the protein needs of 500m people! Thanks to Dr Keerti Rathore — a plant technologist at Texas Agricultural Experiment Station - for carrying out the research.
Though, further field and safety trials are needed, once successful, the technique could turn out to be the ‘killer application’ that supporters of GM technology have long hoped for.
So, can the environmentalists object to a GM crop that has a potential to reduce world hunger on such a scale...?!
Green groups’ disagreement blaming corporate greed as the underlying factor behind the burgeoning growth of the GM industry reflects their perverse obliviousness. Actually, the main reason behind this disinclination is because we’re not sure about the adverse effects of transgenic crops in the coming years. Researchers have not been able to convince on this issue whether they’ll be safe for the sowing land, reapers and consumers or not in the long run. However, there is a clear-cut risk to the “food web” – hurting creatures, especially birds, consuming these, complexes in cross-pollination and also allergies and diseases – genetically modified cotton seeds discussed above by Irani is just one case.
EU’s reluctance towards biotechnology too is firing up resistance towards transgenic crops in the developing countries and directly hurting the right of freedom of farmers.
This biotechnology’s war against hunger can come out fruitful only if applied and approached keeping equal emphasis on environment and health. Moreover, keeping in mind numerous advantages like improved nutritional quality, resistance towards pests and diseases, higher yields and quality and more, we’ve no reason to sit back and not grab the opportunity
#postcomment
If you are suggesting GM is not the only solution, can you tell us what could be other options.
So far, these fears have been unfounded except the reality of so called ’monopolistic seeds’ as I mentioned above. These are social and political issues and maybe environmental too.
The main focus should be on how to produce high quality nutritious foodgrain in large quantities at lowest possible costs that are not too season dependent in order to save the starving millions. Only GM can provide such a solution.
Having said that, I must say that there must be some mechanism to support farmer interests because their livelihood depends on income from their farm produce. Seperate agencies can take up the food distribution responsibilities like the various UN bodies and NGOs that we have all over the world.#postcomment
Local Opinions (14)
Green groups’ disagreement blaming corporate greed as the underlying factor behind the burgeoning growth of the GM industry reflects their perverse obliviousness. Actually, the main reason behind this disinclination is because we’re not sure about the adverse effects of transgenic crops in the coming years. Researchers have not been able to convince on this issue whether they’ll be safe for the sowing land, reapers and consumers or not in the long run. However, there is a clear-cut risk to the “food web” – hurting creatures, especially birds, consuming these, complexes in cross-pollination and also allergies and diseases – genetically modified cotton seeds discussed above by Irani is just one case.
EU’s reluctance towards biotechnology too is firing up resistance towards transgenic crops in the developing countries and directly hurting the right of freedom of farmers.
This biotechnology’s war against hunger can come out fruitful only if applied and approached keeping equal emphasis on environment and health. Moreover, keeping in mind numerous advantages like improved nutritional quality, resistance towards pests and diseases, higher yields and quality and more, we’ve no reason to sit back and not grab the opportunity
#postcomment
If you are suggesting GM is not the only solution, can you tell us what could be other options.
So far, these fears have been unfounded except the reality of so called ’monopolistic seeds’ as I mentioned above. These are social and political issues and maybe environmental too.
The main focus should be on how to produce high quality nutritious foodgrain in large quantities at lowest possible costs that are not too season dependent in order to save the starving millions. Only GM can provide such a solution.
Having said that, I must say that there must be some mechanism to support farmer interests because their livelihood depends on income from their farm produce. Seperate agencies can take up the food distribution responsibilities like the various UN bodies and NGOs that we have all over the world.#postcomment
Global Opinions (14)
Green groups’ disagreement blaming corporate greed as the underlying factor behind the burgeoning growth of the GM industry reflects their perverse obliviousness. Actually, the main reason behind this disinclination is because we’re not sure about the adverse effects of transgenic crops in the coming years. Researchers have not been able to convince on this issue whether they’ll be safe for the sowing land, reapers and consumers or not in the long run. However, there is a clear-cut risk to the “food web” – hurting creatures, especially birds, consuming these, complexes in cross-pollination and also allergies and diseases – genetically modified cotton seeds discussed above by Irani is just one case.
EU’s reluctance towards biotechnology too is firing up resistance towards transgenic crops in the developing countries and directly hurting the right of freedom of farmers.
This biotechnology’s war against hunger can come out fruitful only if applied and approached keeping equal emphasis on environment and health. Moreover, keeping in mind numerous advantages like improved nutritional quality, resistance towards pests and diseases, higher yields and quality and more, we’ve no reason to sit back and not grab the opportunity
#postcomment
If you are suggesting GM is not the only solution, can you tell us what could be other options.
So far, these fears have been unfounded except the reality of so called ’monopolistic seeds’ as I mentioned above. These are social and political issues and maybe environmental too.
The main focus should be on how to produce high quality nutritious foodgrain in large quantities at lowest possible costs that are not too season dependent in order to save the starving millions. Only GM can provide such a solution.
Having said that, I must say that there must be some mechanism to support farmer interests because their livelihood depends on income from their farm produce. Seperate agencies can take up the food distribution responsibilities like the various UN bodies and NGOs that we have all over the world.#postcomment
Home

Delicious
Digg
Facebook
Reddit
Stumble Upon
Technorati
Mixx
Sphinn
Twitter
SphereIt
Propeller
Gmarks
Newsvine
Yahoo! My Web
Live Journal
Blinklist
E-mail
RSS 











